Rushmore review that fails.

|
Rushmore review.

The plot is about a disturbed 15 year old guy who is in love with both his school and a teacher. Doing everything to stay in the school and win over the teachers heart. Oh, well. There’s this other guy who loves her too, and he is the 15 year olds friend. Drama, aaaaaaaloooooooot of drama.

The main characters is mainly three persons; A 15 year old nerd/wannabe/probitchy guy, with the name “Max Fischer” and he makes me wanna kill something. A very ‘smart, intelligent boy with high potentials’. The other main character is Herman Bloom, a boss for a company. He’s Max’s friend and has a very nice Scottish son… The last main is a woman who annoys me, named Miss Cross... Eugh. A kid teacher that feels sorry for Max and … loves Herman, under a time.

The conflict is about Max being in love with Miss Cross, who is in love with Herman, who is in love with… miss Cross also…

The movie had some charm over it however, and not only was drama the dominating reference of it, but comedy was able to sneak into it also. The whole way the two male characters fight for the femenine character is hilarious is some way. It's like two bickering kids fighting over the last slice of pizza.

I didn’t like the movie. End of review.


This is epic fail.

FAIL

|
"Inga borde inte deppa ihop, för hon får inget utav de då. Hon borde ta tag i sig själv och börja upp de hon inte has kunnat göra! I det här fallet, Måleri. Om hon nu så gärna vill göra det ska hon göra det, istället för att sitta och lipa."

This sucks.

Bleurgh

|
"Subjektiv; (recension.) Din egen åsikt. Som du tänker men andra kanske inte håller med.
Objektiv; (Oftast i ett referat) Det som är sant.

Exempel: Den bilen är fin (Subjektiv), Den bilen är Röd (Objektiv).

Brödtext: ... Jag är hungrig..."

*facedesk*